Mariana Pacheco v. Western Iowa Tech Community College

Pacheco · United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Western Division · April 8, 2026 · No. No. C26-4011-LTS-MAR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa considered whether service of process on Western Iowa Tech Community College was insufficient under Iowa law after removal from state court. The court found good cause to extend the service deadline under Iowa law and 28 U.S.C. § 1448, denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss, and granted the plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time and issuance of summons.

Holdings

  1. In an action removed from state court, the sufficiency of service completed before removal is determined by state law, while service completed after removal is governed by federal law.
  2. Pacheco's service on campus security, with anticipated delivery to another employee who was not WITCC's president or secretary, was insufficient under Iowa law.
  3. Pacheco demonstrated good cause under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 1.302(5) to extend the time for service.
  4. Dismissal was not warranted because Iowa law allowed an extension for good cause and Pacheco established good cause; the court therefore could issue summons and permit completion of service under 28 U.S.C. § 1448 and Rule 4(m).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether service completed before removal was insufficient under Iowa law because the papers were not served on WITCC's president or secretary.
  2. Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1448 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) permitted the federal court to allow additional time to complete service after removal.
  3. Whether Pacheco established good cause under Iowa law for an extension of the service deadline.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (9)

  • Barner v. Thompson, 796 F.3d 897, 899-902 (8th Cir. 2015)(followed and applied)
  • Marshall v. Warwick, 155 F.3d 1027, 1029-33 (8th Cir. 1998)(distinguished)
  • Crall v. Davis, 714 N.W.2d 616, 617-21 (Iowa 2006)(applied and distinguished)
  • Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 542 (Iowa 2002)(followed)
  • Wilson v. Ribbens, 678 N.W.2d 417, 421 (Iowa 2004)(applied)
  • Shipp v. Oskaloosa Comm. Sch. Dist., 4:18-cv-00087, 2018 WL 8665815, at *1, *4 (S.D. Iowa May 8, 2018)(distinguished)
  • Mokhtarian v. GTE Midwest Inc., 578 N.W.2d 666, 669 (Iowa 1998)(followed)
  • Rucker v. Taylor, 828 N.W.2d 595, 603-04 (Iowa 2013)(applied)
  • Duwa v. Brooks, No. 08-2038, 2009 WL 5126140, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. Dec. 30, 2009)(analogized)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…