Jeremiah Thomas Hair v. Errick Simmons, et al.

Civil No. 4:25-cv-00095-BWR (N.D. Miss. Apr. 24, 2026) · United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Greenville Division · April 24, 2026 · No. Civil No. 4:25-cv-00095-BWR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi partially dismissed Jeremiah Thomas Hair’s in forma pauperis civil rights action. The court dismissed with prejudice the claims against Sean Jackson and the City of Greenville, Mississippi, finding the claims frivolous or insufficient under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), while allowing claims against Errick Simmons, Derrick Simmons, and Simmons & Simmons Law Firm to proceed. The court also granted Plaintiff’s motion for reasonable accommodation to the extent the requested accommodations were honored at the omnibus hearing.

Holdings

  1. Hair failed to state a § 1983 claim against Jackson because he alleged no specific facts showing that Jackson, a private actor, acted under color of state law or entered into a conspiracy with state actors.
  2. Hair's § 1983 claims against Jackson were time-barred because they accrued no later than April 17, 2015, and were not filed within Mississippi's three-year limitations period.
  3. Hair failed to state a Monell claim against Greenville because he did not identify a specific official policy or custom, establish the required policymaker knowledge, or allege a constitutional violation caused by such a policy or custom.
  4. The claims against Jackson and Greenville were dismissed with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii).

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Hair stated a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Jackson when he alleged that Jackson made false accusations but did not allege facts showing that Jackson acted under color of state law or conspired with state actors.
  2. Whether Hair's § 1983 claims against Jackson were barred by Mississippi's three-year personal-injury limitations period.
  3. Whether Hair stated a municipal-liability claim against Greenville by alleging generalized policies of deliberate indifference without identifying a specific policy, custom, final decision, or supporting facts.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (13)

  • Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179, 181-82 (5th Cir. 1985)(followed)
  • Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 n.3 (1989)(abrogated)
  • Ruiz v. Brennan, 851 F.3d 464, 468 (5th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Fountain v. Rupert, 819 F. App'x 215, 218 (5th Cir. 2020) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Ali v. Higgs, 892 F.2d 438, 440 (5th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Brewster v. Dretke, 587 F.3d 764, 768 (5th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Rockette v. Carpenter Mgmt. Co., No. 3:23-cv-00406-MPM-RP, 2025 WL 888427, at *2 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 21, 2025)(followed)
  • Clark v. McAllister, No. 3:21-cv-00219-RP, 2022 WL 2761305, at *3 (N.D. Miss. July 13, 2022)(followed)
  • Green v. Montgomery, No. 3:25-cv-00340-JDM-RP, 2026 WL 906452, at *2 (N.D. Miss. Apr. 2, 2026)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 13.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from United States District Court For The Northern District Of Mississippi Greenville Division United Sta