Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of New York grants in part Bernice Jackson’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). The court awards $32,065.75 from Jackson’s past-due Social Security benefits and directs counsel to refund the previously awarded $6,115.56 EAJA fee to Jackson rather than offsetting it against the § 406(b) award.
Holdings
- The requested fee of $32,065.75 was reasonable and could be awarded from Jackson's past-due benefits because it complied with the 25% statutory and contractual limit, was supported by a fully favorable result, involved no fraud, overreaching, or undue delay, and did not constitute a windfall.
- The EAJA fee should not be netted from the § 406(b) award; instead, counsel must refund the previously received EAJA fee of $6,115.56 to Jackson.
Questions Presented
- Whether the requested attorney's fee of $32,065.75 under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1) was reasonable.
- Whether the previously awarded EAJA fee should be netted against the § 406(b) fee award or refunded directly to Jackson.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796, 798 n.6 (2002)(followed)
- Fields v. Kijakazi, 24 F.4th 845, 853-56 (2d Cir. 2022)(applied)
- Franklin P. v. Commissioner of Social Security, 6:21-CV-162, 2022 WL 3371148 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2022)(followed by analogy)
- Eric K. v. Berryhill, No. 5:15-cv-00845 (BKS), 2019 WL 1025791, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2019)(followed by analogy)
- Kazanjian v. Astrue, No. 09-CV-3678 (BMC), 2011 WL 2847439, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. July 15, 2011)(followed by analogy)
- Duane P. v. Bisignano, 2025 WL 1707224 (S.D.N.Y. 2025)(persuasive)
- Flynn v. Saul, 2023 WL 2815120 (S.D.N.Y. 2023)(persuasive)
- Johnson v. Kijakazi, No. 20-CV-2630, 2022 WL 17718336, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 15, 2022)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…