Summary
The Northern District of New York granted Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, denied the Commissioner's motion, and remanded the Social Security disability case for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The court held that the ALJ inadequately explained the evaluation of a treating physician's medical source statement and failed to make clear whether the treating physician rule was properly applied. The court declined to remand solely for calculation of benefits.
Holdings
- Remand was required because the ALJ did not identify the author of the medical source statement as a treating physician, making it impossible to determine whether the treating physician rule was applied.
- The ALJ erred by grouping the medical source statement with other opinions and concluding, without adequate record support, that it was based on limited evaluations and Plaintiff's subjective complaints.
- The case was remanded for further administrative proceedings and reconsideration, not solely for calculation of benefits.
Questions Presented
- Whether the ALJ applied the treating physician rule when evaluating the medical source statement attributed to Dr. Reid.
- Whether substantial evidence and adequate explanation supported the ALJ's rejection of the medical source statement and related medical opinions.
- Whether the matter should be remanded for further administrative proceedings or solely for calculation of benefits.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (24)
- Wagner v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 906 F.2d 856, 860 (2d Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Johnson v. Bowen, 817 F.2d 983, 986 (2d Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Grey v. Heckler, 721 F.2d 41, 46 (2d Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Marcus v. Califano, 615 F.2d 23, 27 (2d Cir. 1979)(followed)
- Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 (1971)(followed)
- Rutherford v. Schweiker, 685 F.2d 60, 62 (2d Cir. 1982)(followed)
- Williams v. Bowen, 859 F.2d 255, 258 (2d Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Rosado v. Sullivan, 805 F. Supp. 147, 153 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)(followed)
- Valente v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 733 F.2d 1037, 1041 (2d Cir. 1984)(followed)
- Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-42 (1987)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…