Summary
This Report and Recommendation addresses a pro se plaintiff’s Social Security action challenging the denial of supplemental security income benefits. The magistrate judge recommends dismissal without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to cure deficiencies in her in forma pauperis application, pay the filing fee, or respond to court orders and notices.
Questions Presented
- Whether the case should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to cure deficiencies in her in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee.
- Whether Plaintiff's failure to respond to the court's orders and notices warranted dismissal at the initial stage of the case.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Woolverton-Jones v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:21-CV-01027-JDB-JAY, 2021 WL 12268157, at *1 (W.D. Tenn. May 10, 2021)(followed)
- Bryant v. United States, 618 F. App’x 683, 685 (Fed. Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Committe v. John Carroll Univ., No. 1:18CV01372, 2019 WL 913054, at *4 (N.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2019)(followed)
- Wilson v. Yaklich, 148 F.3d 596, 603 (6th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Berkshire v. Dahl, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Howard v. Sec’y of Health and Hum. Servs., 932 F.2d 505, 509 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- Overholt v. Green, No. 1:17-CV-00186, 2018 WL 3018175, at *2 (W.D. Ky. June 15, 2018)(followed)
- United States v. Wandahsega, 924 F.3d 868, 878-79 (6th Cir. 2019)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…