Enrico Renaldo Taffi v. Commissioner of Social Security

Taffi · United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division · March 12, 2026 · No. 5:25-cv-00040

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation concerning Enrico Renaldo Taffi’s challenge to the denial of Period of Disability and Disability Insurance Benefits. Because no timely objections were filed and the court found no clear error, it affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision.

Holdings

  1. When no timely objections are filed to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record before accepting the recommendation.
  2. The court found no clear error in the Report and Recommendation, adopted it, and affirmed the Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's application for benefits.

Questions Presented

  1. What standard of review applies to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation when no timely objections are filed?
  2. Whether the Report and Recommendation recommending affirmance of the Commissioner's denial of benefits should be adopted after review for clear error.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Campbell v. United States Dist. Court, 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 879(followed)
  • Schuster v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 2022 WL 219327, at *1 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 25, 2022)(followed)
  • Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530 (6th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152 (1985)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…