Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denied Denali Water Solutions, Inc.’s motion to transfer venue to the Northern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). The court concluded that the relevant private and public interest factors did not strongly favor transfer and therefore gave substantial deference to Enviroserve, Inc.’s choice of Ohio as the forum.
Holdings
- Transfer was not warranted because Denali failed to meet its burden of showing that the relevant factors strongly outweighed the factors favoring maintenance of the Ohio forum.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be transferred from the Northern District of Ohio to the Northern District of Texas under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).
- Whether the private- and public-interest factors, including the plaintiff's forum choice, convenience of parties and witnesses, location of evidence, applicable law, and relative local interests, strongly favored transfer.
Disposition
denied
Cases Cited (10)
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge F.B.L.-585, 364 U.S. 19, 27 (1960)(followed)
- Phelps v. McClellan, 30 F.3d 658, 663 (6th Cir. 1994)(followed)
- Cote v. Wadel, 796 F.2d 981, 985 (7th Cir. 1986)(followed)
- Tobien v. Nationwide Gen. Ins. Co., 133 F.4th 613, 618 n.2 (6th Cir. 2025)(followed)
- Moses v. Business Card Express, Inc., 929 F.2d 1131, 1137 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- USA v. Cinemark USA, Inc., 66 F. Supp. 2d 881, 887 (N.D. Ohio 1999)(followed)
- West American Ins. Co. v. Potts, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12513, 1990 WL 104034, at *2 (6th Cir. July 25, 1990)(followed)
- Kerobo v. Sw. Clean Fuels Corp., 285 F.3d 531, 537 (6th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Reese v. CNH Am., LLC, 574 F.3d 315, 320 (6th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Nicol v. Koscinski, 199 F.2d 537, 537 (6th Cir. 1951)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…