Mark Scheibe v. Wayne County, et al.

Scheibe · United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division · February 5, 2026 · No. 5:24-cv-432

Summary

The court recommends dismissing Mark Scheibe’s complaint with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The recommendation is based on Scheibe’s failure to attend a case management conference and a subsequent show-cause hearing, despite court orders and warnings that dismissal could result.

Holdings

  1. The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice because Plaintiff willfully failed to prosecute, prejudiced Defendants, had been warned that dismissal could result, and failed to comply with multiple straightforward court orders.
  2. Plaintiff’s pro se status did not excuse his failure to comply with clear and straightforward court orders or attendance requirements.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiff’s repeated failure to attend court-ordered proceedings and comply with court directives warranted dismissal with prejudice for failure to prosecute under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
  2. Whether dismissal was appropriate after considering willfulness, prejudice, warning, and the availability of lesser sanctions.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (10)

  • Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 48 (1991)(followed)
  • Link v. Wabash Railroad Co., 370 U.S. 626, 632 (1962)(followed)
  • Marchand v. Smith & Nephew, No. 11-2621, 2013 WL 6780559, at *2 (W.D. Tenn. Dec. 19, 2013)(followed)
  • Schafer v. City of Defiance Police Department, 529 F.3d 731, 737 (6th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Shavers v. Bergh, 516 F. App’x 568, 569–71 (6th Cir. 2013)(followed)
  • Jourdan v. Jabe, 951 F.2d 108, 109–10 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Ward v. American Pizza Co., 279 F.R.D. 45l, 458 (S.D. Ohio 2012)(followed)
  • Fields v. County of Lapeer, 2000 WL 1720727, at *2 (6th Cir. Nov. 8, 2000)(followed)
  • Bradenburg v. Beaman, 632 F.2d 120, 122 (10th Cir. 1980)(followed)
  • Berkshire v. Beauvais, 928 F.3d 520, 530–31 (6th Cir. 2019)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…