Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio reviewed a magistrate judge’s recommendation in a Social Security appeal. Because no timely objections were filed, the court adopted the Report and Recommendation and affirmed the Commissioner’s final decision.
Holdings
- A party’s failure to file timely written objections to a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation waives de novo review by the district court of the issues covered in the Report and Recommendation.
- The Commissioner of Social Security’s final decision is affirmed, and the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted as the order of the district court.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation when no timely objections were filed.
- Whether the Commissioner’s final Social Security decision should be affirmed.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813, 814-15 (6th Cir. 1984)(followed)
- United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…