Grant A. Carpenter, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Ricky Wayne Franks, deceased v. City of Bartlesville, Oklahoma and Braxton Bowers

Carpenter · United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma · March 16, 2026 · No. 25-cv-00153-SH

Summary

The court partially grants and partially denies defendants' motion to dismiss in an action arising from the shooting death of Ricky Wayne Franks by a Bartlesville police officer. The court dismisses without prejudice the plaintiff's state-law claims against the City of Bartlesville for failure to provide timely notice under the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act. The court declines to dismiss the remaining claims for untimely service and permits the late service because defendants were properly served, suffered no apparent prejudice, and dismissal could bar the § 1983 claims under the statute of limitations.

Court
United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Writing for the Court
Susan E. Huntsman, Magistrate Judge
Jurisdiction
United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Decision date
March 16, 2026
Docket number
25-cv-00153-SH
Procedural posture
Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for untimely service of process and, as to the City, for failure to provide timely pre-suit notice under the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act. The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part.
Standard of review
For a factual Rule 12(b)(1) attack, the court does not presume the complaint's jurisdictional allegations are true and may consider evidence outside the pleadings. Under Rule 4(m), the court first determines whether good cause requires a mandatory extension and, if not, considers whether a permissive extension is warranted in its discretion.
Precedential value
Unknown; unpublished district court opinion
Disposition
other

Topics

service of processsubject matter jurisdictionsection 1983government liabilitycivil procedure

Practice areas

civil procedurecivil rightsconstitutional lawmunicipal lawtorts

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff's state-law claims against the City were barred for lack of timely pre-suit notice under the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act, thereby depriving the court of subject-matter jurisdiction.
  2. Whether the action should be dismissed because Defendants were served seven days after the Rule 4(m) 90-day service period.
  3. Whether the court should exercise its discretion to extend the time for service under Rule 4(m) despite the absence of good cause.

Holdings

  1. Timely pre-suit notice under the Oklahoma Governmental Tort Claims Act is a mandatory prerequisite and jurisdictional requirement for a tort claim against a covered governmental entity. Because Plaintiff's notice was delivered more than one year after the loss, the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the state-law claims against the City, which were dismissed without prejudice.
  2. Dismissal was not appropriate based on Plaintiff's seven-day delay in serving Defendants. The court had authority to extend the service deadline, and the circumstances supported a permissive extension.

Key quotations

This notice “is considered a mandatory prerequisite and jurisdictional requirement” to filing a claim in court. (at 3)
When considering a Rule 4(m) motion, the Court engages in a two-step inquiry. (at 5)

Factual background

Ricky Wayne Franks died on July 5, 2023, after being shot by Braxton Bowers, an officer of the Bartlesville Police Department. The City of Bartlesville provides the police department and employs Bowers. Plaintiff provided pre-suit notice to the City on July 8, 2024, more than one year after Franks's death. Plaintiff served the City and Bowers on July 7, 2025, approximately one week after the Rule 4(m) service period had expired.

Procedural history

Plaintiff's predecessor filed the action on April 1, 2025, asserting a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Fourth Amendment claim, a state-law negligence claim, and an Oklahoma constitutional excessive-force claim. After the estate was probated, the court substituted Grant A. Carpenter as special administrator. The court previously ordered Plaintiff to file returns of service or show good cause; Plaintiff filed returns showing that both Defendants had been served on July 7, 2025. On Defendants' subsequent motion to dismiss, the court dismissed the state-law claims against the City without prejudice for untimely OGTCA notice and denied dismissal based on late service.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…