Summary
The United States Magistrate Judge recommends that Willie Otis Harris’s prisoner civil rights action be dismissed without prejudice under the Prison Litigation Reform Act’s three-strikes rule, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), unless he pays the full $405 filing fee. The recommendation finds that Harris has accrued at least three qualifying strikes and has not alleged facts showing imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Holdings
- A prisoner who has accumulated at least three prior federal civil actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim may not proceed without prepaying the filing fee unless the imminent-danger exception applies. Harris had accumulated at least three qualifying strikes and was therefore barred from proceeding without prepayment.
- The imminent-danger exception did not apply because Harris made no factual allegations suggesting that he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury.
Questions Presented
- Whether Harris could proceed without prepaying the filing fee despite having accumulated at least three prior qualifying dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
- Whether Harris alleged facts establishing that he was under imminent danger of serious physical injury, the statutory exception to the three-strikes bar.
- Whether the action should be summarily dismissed without prejudice unless Harris paid the full filing fee.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez, 140 S. Ct. 1721, 1723 (2020)(followed)
- Harris v. Thaler, No. 4:00-CV-2379 (S.D. Tex. May 24, 2001)(applied)
- Harris v. State Bar of Tex., No. 3:99-CV-1381-T (N.D. Tex. Oct. 1, 1999)(applied)
- Harris v. Plentl, No. 6:94-CV-102-HWM (E.D. Tex. Apr. 29, 1994)(applied)
- Harris v. Cockrell, No. 6:93-CV-773-HWM (E.D. Tex. May 16, 1994)(applied)
- Harris v. Lang, No. 6:92-CV-626-JKG (E.D. Tex. Dec. 18, 1992)(applied)
- Banos v. O'Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 884 (5th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Valdez v. Bush, No. 3:08-CV-1481-N, 2008 WL 4710808, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Oct. 24, 2008)(followed)
- Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…