Lester E. Washington, Jr. v. Marriott International Inc., et al.

Washington v. Marriott · United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division · January 20, 2026 · No. 3:25-cv-02868-S (BT)

Summary

A United States magistrate judge recommends denying Lester E. Washington, Jr.’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in his civil action against Marriott International, Inc., and others. The recommendation would dismiss the case without prejudice unless Plaintiff pays the $405 filing fee within 30 days of an order accepting the recommendation.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff did not establish that payment of the $405 filing fee would cause undue financial hardship, so his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied.
  2. The action should be dismissed without prejudice unless Plaintiff pays the $405 filing fee within 30 days after an order accepting the recommendation.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff established under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) that he was unable to pay the filing fee or that payment would cause undue financial hardship.
  2. Whether the case should be dismissed without prejudice if Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee within 30 days after acceptance of the recommendation.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (7)

  • Prows v. Kastner, 842 F.2d 138, 140 (5th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Nottingham v. Warden, Bill Clements Unit, 837 F.3d 438, 439-40 (5th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Moates v. Biden, 2022 WL 3566451, at *1 (W.D. Tex. June 29, 2022)(followed)
  • Powell v. Gov. Federal Rsrv. of New York, 2014 WL 1883672, at *2 (S.D. Miss. May 12, 2014)(analogized)
  • Dobbins v. Kroger Co., 2009 WL 186141, at *2 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2009)(followed)
  • Ramsey v. NFI Indus., 2022 WL 707234, at *1 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 18, 2022)(followed)
  • Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…