Summary
The magistrate judge recommends granting the Commissioner’s unopposed motion to reverse and remand a Social Security case under the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The document explains the distinction between sentence-four and sentence-six remands and recommends remand for further administrative action.
Holdings
- A sentence-four remand is appropriate where the court enters a judgment reversing the Commissioner's decision and remands the case for further administrative proceedings; a sentence-six remand is reserved for the statutory circumstances identified in § 405(g), including a pre-answer request by the Commissioner or qualifying new and material evidence.
- The magistrate judge recommended granting the Commissioner's unopposed motion, reversing the case, and remanding it to the Commissioner for further administrative action.
Questions Presented
- Whether the unopposed motion should be granted under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
- Whether the requested remand is properly characterized as a sentence-four rather than a sentence-six remand.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (7)
- Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991)(followed)
- Schriner v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:08-CV-2042-N, 2010 WL 2941120, at *15 (N.D. Tex. June 22, 2010), recommendation adopted, 2010 WL 2944782 (N.D. Tex. July 22, 2010)(followed)
- Shalala v. Shaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993)(followed)
- McKenzie v. Astrue, 442 F. App'x 161 (5th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Chelette v. United States Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:11-CV-1860, 2012 WL 2870842, at *2 (W.D. La. June 12, 2012), recommendation adopted, 2012 WL 2873635 (W.D. La. July 12, 2012)(followed)
- Istre v. Apfel, 208 F.3d 517, 520 (5th Cir. 2000)(followed)
- Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1417 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), modified by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…