Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California denied without prejudice a joint motion to dismiss several counterclaims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The court held that Rule 41 does not permit dismissal of fewer than all claims against certain defendants and that Rule 15 is the appropriate procedural mechanism.
Holdings
- Rule 41(a) applies to voluntary dismissal of an action, not to dismissal of fewer than all claims when other claims remain pending against the same defendants.
- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, rather than Rule 41, is the appropriate mechanism when a party seeks to eliminate an issue or fewer than all claims without dismissing the action as to the defendants.
Questions Presented
- Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) permits the parties to dismiss fewer than all of Circle K's counterclaims while leaving another counterclaim pending against some of the same defendants.
- Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, rather than Rule 41, is the proper procedural mechanism for eliminating individual claims without dismissing the action as to the defendants.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Ethridge v. Harbor House Rest., 861 F.2d 1389, 1392 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
- Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Gen. Signal Corp. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., 66 F.3d 1500, 1513 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…