Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California dismissed a pro se state prisoner’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action without prejudice. The court found that the plaintiff failed to state a claim and failed to prosecute after repeatedly receiving extensions of time to file an amended complaint.
Holdings
- When a plaintiff does not take advantage of an opportunity to cure deficiencies in a complaint, the district court may dismiss the entire action; because Burton filed no amended complaint after multiple extensions, dismissal without prejudice was warranted.
- Failure to file an amended complaint after repeated extensions and an explicit warning warranted dismissal for failure to prosecute.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed for failure to state a claim after plaintiff failed to amend the complaint despite being granted leave and multiple extensions.
- Whether the action should be dismissed for failure to prosecute when plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (1)
- Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d 1164, 1169 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…