Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California grants Latawnya Cowan’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismisses her complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a plausible claim based on conclusory allegations of disability discrimination and retaliation by San Diego County. The court grants leave to amend within thirty days.
Holdings
- Cowan qualified to proceed in forma pauperis because her affidavit sufficiently demonstrated that she lacked the financial resources to pay the filing fee.
- The complaint failed to state a claim because it did not identify a cause of action or allege facts plausibly establishing the elements of a claim.
- The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend, and Cowan was required to file a complete amended complaint within thirty days.
Questions Presented
- Whether Cowan qualified to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
- Whether the complaint stated a plausible claim for relief sufficient to survive mandatory screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
- Whether Cowan should be granted leave to amend after dismissal for failure to state a claim.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc)(followed)
- Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009)(followed)
- United States v. Qazi, 975 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir. 2020)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…