Doe v. Bondi

Doe v. Bondi · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · June 11, 2025 · No. 25-cv-805-BJC-JLB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted a limited temporary restraining order preventing the defendants from removing Jane Doe from the United States or the district pending further order. The court found that a temporary stay was appropriate to preserve the status quo while it considered jurisdiction and converted the scheduled motion hearing into a counsel-only status conference. The court waived the bond requirement.

Holdings

  1. A federal district court may temporarily preserve the status quo, including by staying removal, while determining whether it has subject matter jurisdiction and while the underlying petition remains pending.
  2. A limited-duration temporary restraining order barring defendants from removing plaintiff was warranted to maintain the status quo pending the court's hearing and further order.
  3. The court could dispense with a bond because the record did not indicate that the temporary stay was likely to harm defendants.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court could temporarily enjoin defendants from removing plaintiff while determining whether it had subject matter jurisdiction over the case.
  2. Whether a limited-duration temporary restraining order was appropriate to preserve the status quo pending a hearing and reasoned decision.
  3. Whether the court should require plaintiff to post a bond for the temporary restraining order.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Brownback v. King, 592 U.S. 209, 218-19 (2021)(followed)
  • United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622, 628 (2002)(followed)
  • United States v. United Mine Workers of Am., 330 U.S. 258, 293 (1947)(followed)
  • Belbacha v. Bush, 520 F.3d 452, 456 (D.C. Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Garcia-Izquierdo v. Gartner, No. 04-CV-7377 (RCC), 2004 WL 2093515, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 17, 2004)(followed)
  • Gorbach v. Reno, 219 F.3d 1087, 1092 (9th Cir. 2000)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…