Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California denied Robert Dudash’s application to proceed in forma pauperis without prejudice because the application did not provide sufficient information about his income, assets, or expenses. The court gave him fourteen days to either pay the filing fee or submit a complete renewed application, warning that failure to comply would result in dismissal without prejudice.
Holdings
- An applicant seeking in forma pauperis status must accurately and fully complete the application by identifying income, expenses, and assets so the court can evaluate the applicant's ability to pay. Because Plaintiff's application omitted that information, the court denied the motion without prejudice.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application sufficiently alleged poverty and provided enough financial information for the court to determine his ability to pay the filing fee.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339 (1948)(followed)
- Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- United States v. McQuade, 647 F.3d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981)(followed)
- Temple v. Ellerthorp, 586 F. Supp. 848, 850 (D.R.I. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…