Ellis-Sanders v. Guardian Piazza D’Oro LLC

Ellis-Sanders · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · June 9, 2025 · No. 25-cv-1379-JO-DDL

Summary

The court partially denied a pro se plaintiff’s ex parte motion to seal the entire case, applying the compelling-reasons standard and the presumption of public access to court records. The court permitted sealing of the minor daughter’s full name, specified medical records, and specified email addresses, ordered redacted resubmissions, and directed the Clerk to restrict access to current filings.

Holdings

  1. The court denied plaintiff’s request to seal the entire case because generalized privacy concerns about medical conditions did not overcome the strong presumption of public access to court records.
  2. The court granted limited sealing for the minor daughter’s full name, medical records filed as Exhibit C to the TRO motion, and specified email addresses contained in Exhibits B and D to the TRO motion and Exhibit F to the complaint.
  3. The court denied sealing of the remaining documents, including court filings from the unlawful detainer and appellate proceedings and the underlying lease agreement, because plaintiff did not satisfy the compelling-reasons standard or narrowly tailor the request.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff established compelling reasons sufficient to seal the entire case and all related filings.
  2. Whether discrete portions of the filings, including a minor’s full name, medical records, and email addresses, should be sealed or redacted.
  3. What redaction and access restrictions were necessary to protect sensitive information while preserving public access to court records.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Harrell v. California Forensic Med. Grp., Inc., No. 2:15-CV-00579 KJN P, 2015 WL 1405567, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2015)(followed)
  • Rock v. McHugh, 819 F. Supp. 2d 456, 476 (D. Md. 2011)(followed)
  • A.C. v. City of Santa Clara, No. 13-CV-03276-HSG, 2015 WL 4076364, at *2 (N.D. Cal. July 2, 2015)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…