Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California ordered the respondents to show cause why Erfan Eftekhari’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should not be granted. The court set a briefing schedule and stayed Eftekhari’s removal from the district pending further order to preserve jurisdiction.
Holdings
- The court required respondents to show cause why the petition should not be granted, to file relevant documents, and to address whether an evidentiary hearing was necessary.
- The court ordered that petitioner not be removed from the Southern District of California unless and until the court ordered otherwise, pending resolution of the habeas matter.
Questions Presented
- Whether respondents should be required to show cause why the § 2241 habeas petition should not be granted.
- Whether the court should temporarily prevent petitioner’s removal from the district to preserve jurisdiction while the habeas petition was pending.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Doe v. Bondi, Case No. 25-cv-805-BJC-JLB, 2025 WL 1870979, at *2 (S.D. Cal. June 11, 2025)(followed)
- A.M. v. LaRose et al., 25-cv-01412, ECF No. 2 (S.D. Cal. June 4, 2025)(followed)
- A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 97 (2025)(followed)
- Nguyen v. Scott, No. 2:25-CV-01398, 2025 WL 2097979, at *3 (W.D. Wash. July 25, 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…