Evans v. County of Imperial

No. 25-cv-249-BEN (LR) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2025) · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · March 28, 2025 · No. 25-cv-249-BEN (LR)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted the County of Imperial's unopposed motion to dismiss. The court deemed the lack of opposition consent under the local rules and dismissed the claims against the County without prejudice after weighing the factors identified in Ghazali v. Moran.

Holdings

  1. A plaintiff's failure to file an opposition to a motion to dismiss may be treated as consent to the motion under the district's local rules, and dismissal may be granted when the required factors support that result.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the plaintiff's failure to oppose the County of Imperial's motion to dismiss permitted the court to treat the motion as unopposed and grant dismissal under the district's local rules.
  2. Whether dismissal without prejudice was appropriate under the five-factor analysis required for failure to comply with local rules.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (4)

  • Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53-54 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Wave Plastic Surgery Ctr., Inc. v. Beauty Art Ctr., LLC, No. CV205125 DSFMAAX, 2022 WL 2288315, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2022)(followed)
  • V.V.V. & Sons Edible Oils Limited v. Meenakshi Overseas, LLC, 946 F.3d 542, 547 (9th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Jenkins v. County of Riverside, 398 F.3d 1093, 1095 n.4 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…