Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California orders the respondents to show cause why Filadelfo Rodriguez-Sanchez’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 should not be granted. The Court establishes deadlines for the response, service, and any traverse, and sets an order-to-show-cause hearing. The Court also stays the petitioner’s removal from the United States or the Southern District of California pending further order to preserve jurisdiction.
Holdings
- The court may stay petitioner's removal from the United States or the district pending further order to preserve the status quo and the court's jurisdiction while the petition is pending.
- Respondents must show cause by filing a written response explaining why the petition should not be granted by the specified deadline.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should temporarily prevent respondents from removing petitioner while the court determines the petition and its subject-matter jurisdiction.
- What response, briefing, service, and hearing schedule should govern the pending § 2241 petition and request for injunctive relief.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Doe v. Bondi, Case No. 25-cv-805-BJC-JLB, 2025 WL 1870979, at *2 (S.D. Cal. June 11, 2025)(followed)
- A.M. v. LaRose et al., 25-cv-01412, ECF No. 2 (S.D. Cal. June 4, 2025)(followed)
- A.A.R.P. v. Trump, 605 U.S. 91, 97 (2025)(followed)
- Nguyen v. Scott, No. 2:25-CV-01398, 2025 WL 2097979, at *3 (W.D. Wash. July 25, 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…