Filippo Eleuteri v. Gregory J. Archambrault, et al.

Case No. 25-cv-03620-BAS-DDL (S.D. Cal. Dec. 17, 2025) · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · December 17, 2025 · No. 25-cv-03620-BAS-DDL

Summary

The court orders the government to respond to Filippo Eleuteri’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his ICE detention. The court denies his ex parte request for a temporary restraining order, sets briefing deadlines on his motion for injunctive relief, and provides notice that it intends to consider consolidation under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)(2).

Holdings

  1. Summary dismissal was unwarranted at that time because the petition's allegations were not shown to be vague or conclusory, palpably incredible, or patently frivolous or false; therefore, the Government was ordered to respond.
  2. The court denied the ex parte request for a temporary restraining order because extraordinary circumstances were not established and the Government should receive notice and a reasonable opportunity to oppose the requested relief.
  3. The court provided notice that it intended to consolidate the motion for injunctive relief with a determination on the merits under Rule 65(a)(2), subject to the parties' opportunity to respond.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the habeas petition warranted summary dismissal at the initial screening stage.
  2. Whether the court should issue an ex parte temporary restraining order without providing the Government notice and an opportunity to respond.
  3. Whether the court could provide notice of its intent to consolidate the motion for injunctive relief with a determination on the merits under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a)(2).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Kourteva v. INS, 151 F. Supp. 2d 1126, 1128 (N.D. Cal. 2001)(followed)
  • Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70 of Alameda County, 415 U.S. 423, 438-39 (1974)(followed)
  • Reno Air Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. McCord, 452 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Slidewaters LLC v. Washington State Department of Labor & Industries, 4 F.4th 747, 759 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…