Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California orders the respondents to respond to Francisco Javier Quiroz Figueroa’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his immigration detention. The court finds that his claim—that he is subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A)—has sufficient potential merit to warrant a response and sets deadlines for the response, reply, and oral argument.
Holdings
- The petition should not be summarily dismissed because the challenge to petitioner's immigration detention had sufficient potential merit to warrant a response.
Questions Presented
- Whether the § 2241 petition stated a sufficiently cognizable and potentially meritorious challenge to petitioner's immigration detention to warrant a response rather than summary dismissal.
- Whether petitioner's argument that § 1226(a), rather than § 1225(b)(2)(A), governs his detention presented a potentially meritorious statutory and due-process claim.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Neiss v. Bludworth, 114 F.4th 1038, 1045 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I.&N. Dec. 216 (BIA 2025)(discussed)
- Barco Mercado y. Francis, No. 25-cv-6582 (LAK), 2025 WL 3295903, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2025)(persuasive)
- Mosqueda v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-02304 CAS (BFM), 2025 WL 2591530, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2025)(persuasive)
- Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 2:25-cv-01542-RFB-EJY, 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025)(persuasive)
- Rodriguez v. Bostock, No. 3:25-cv-05240-TMC, 2025 WL 2782499, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 30, 2025)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…