Francisco Javier Quiroz Figueroa v. Christopher LaRose, et al.

Quiroz Figueroa · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · December 17, 2025 · No. 25-cv-3623-AGS-DEB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California orders the respondents to respond to Francisco Javier Quiroz Figueroa’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his immigration detention. The court finds that his claim—that he is subject to detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2)(A)—has sufficient potential merit to warrant a response and sets deadlines for the response, reply, and oral argument.

Holdings

  1. The petition should not be summarily dismissed because the challenge to petitioner's immigration detention had sufficient potential merit to warrant a response.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the § 2241 petition stated a sufficiently cognizable and potentially meritorious challenge to petitioner's immigration detention to warrant a response rather than summary dismissal.
  2. Whether petitioner's argument that § 1226(a), rather than § 1225(b)(2)(A), governs his detention presented a potentially meritorious statutory and due-process claim.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Neiss v. Bludworth, 114 F.4th 1038, 1045 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I.&N. Dec. 216 (BIA 2025)(discussed)
  • Barco Mercado y. Francis, No. 25-cv-6582 (LAK), 2025 WL 3295903, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2025)(persuasive)
  • Mosqueda v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-02304 CAS (BFM), 2025 WL 2591530, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2025)(persuasive)
  • Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 2:25-cv-01542-RFB-EJY, 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025)(persuasive)
  • Rodriguez v. Bostock, No. 3:25-cv-05240-TMC, 2025 WL 2782499, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 30, 2025)(persuasive)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…