Hoyos Mendoza v. Dudek

Hoyos Mendoza · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · March 3, 2025 · No. 25-cv-365-DDL

Summary

The court grants Plaintiff Analaura H.M.’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in her action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The court also finds that the complaint satisfies the pleading requirements under the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, states a plausible claim, and survives screening.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff adequately demonstrated that she lacked the financial resources to pay the civil filing fee and was entitled to proceed in forma pauperis.
  2. The complaint satisfied the applicable Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, stated a plausible claim for relief, and was neither frivolous nor malicious; therefore, the action could proceed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff demonstrated that she was unable to pay the civil filing fee and therefore qualified to proceed in forma pauperis.
  2. Whether Plaintiff's Social Security complaint satisfied the pleading requirements of Rule 2 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions and survived screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 200)(followed)
  • Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948)(followed)
  • Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1235 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…