Summary
The court grants Plaintiff Analaura H.M.’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in her action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. The court also finds that the complaint satisfies the pleading requirements under the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, states a plausible claim, and survives screening.
Holdings
- Plaintiff adequately demonstrated that she lacked the financial resources to pay the civil filing fee and was entitled to proceed in forma pauperis.
- The complaint satisfied the applicable Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions, stated a plausible claim for relief, and was neither frivolous nor malicious; therefore, the action could proceed.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff demonstrated that she was unable to pay the civil filing fee and therefore qualified to proceed in forma pauperis.
- Whether Plaintiff's Social Security complaint satisfied the pleading requirements of Rule 2 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions and survived screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 200)(followed)
- Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948)(followed)
- Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1235 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…