Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a remand in a Social Security disability case and a fully favorable decision on remand. The court approved $40,336.00 in fees, payable from plaintiff’s past-due benefits, and ordered counsel to refund the previously awarded $5,261.00 in Equal Access to Justice Act fees to plaintiff.
Holdings
- The requested $40,336.00 fee was reasonable and did not require a downward adjustment because it was within the 25-percent statutory ceiling, counsel provided timely and effective representation, there was no litigation delay, and the fee was not excessive in relation to the benefits obtained.
- Counsel must refund the $5,261.00 previously received under the EAJA to Plaintiff because the EAJA and § 406(b) awards compensated the same work.
Questions Presented
- Whether the contingent-fee agreement and requested $40,336.00 fee were reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
- Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded $5,261.00 EAJA fee to Plaintiff after receiving the § 406(b) fee.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796, 802 (2002)(followed)
- Parrish v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 698 F.3d 1215, 1218 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Tamiko T. v. Kijakazi, Case No. 20cv1229-KSC, 2023 WL 253114, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 18, 2023)(followed)
- Reddick v. Berryhill, Case No. 16-cv-29-BTM-BLM, 2019 WL 2330895, at *2 (S.D. Cal. May 30, 2019)(followed)
- Roland S. v. Kijakazi, No. 20-cv-1068, 2023 WL 6966153, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2023)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…