Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California held that the petitioner, a long-term resident detained in removal proceedings, was unlawfully detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2). The court granted the habeas petition and ordered respondents to provide an individualized bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) within seven days, while denying the motion for a temporary restraining order as moot.
Holdings
- Sections 1252(b)(9) and 1252(g) did not deprive the district court of jurisdiction to consider Petitioner's § 2241 challenge to the statutory basis for his detention.
- Prudential exhaustion was excused because requiring exhaustion would have been futile in light of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision in Matter of Yajure Hurtado.
- An individual who has been residing in the United States and has not affirmatively applied for admission or a change of status is not subject to mandatory detention under § 1225(b)(2) merely because the individual is inadmissible and has not been admitted or paroled.
- The appropriate relief was an individualized bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than immediate release, because § 1226(a) permits continued detention following a lawful discretionary bond determination.
Questions Presented
- Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(9) or § 1252(g) deprived the district court of jurisdiction over Petitioner's § 2241 challenge to his immigration detention.
- Whether prudential exhaustion of administrative remedies should be required when exhaustion would be futile in light of Matter of Yajure Hurtado.
- Whether Petitioner, an individual residing in the United States who had not affirmatively applied for admission or a change of status, was subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2) or instead the discretionary detention framework of § 1226(a).
- What relief was appropriate if detention under § 1225(b)(2) was unlawful.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (10)
- Tijerina v. Thornburgh, 884 F.2d 861, 866 (5th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- Matter of Yajure Hurtado, 29 I&N Dec. 216 (BIA 2025)(applied)
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 525 (2004)(followed)
- Vasquez Garcia v. Noem, 2025 WL 2549431, at *3-4, *6 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 3, 2025)(followed)
- Medina-Ortiz v. Noem, No. 25-cv-02819-DMS-MMP, ECF No. 7, at 3-4 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2025)(followed)
- Esquivel-Ipina v. LaRose, No. 25-CV-2672 JLS (BLM), 2025 WL 2998361, at *3-5 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2025)(followed)
- Vasquez v. Feeley, 2025 WL 2676082, at *10 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025)(followed)
- Castellanos Lopez v. Warden, 2025 WL 3005346, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 27, 2025)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. Bostock, 779 F. Supp. 3d 1239, 1256, 1263 (W.D. Wash. 2025)(followed)
- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 294-95 (2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…