Kimera Labs Inc. v. Jayashankar, et al.

Kimera Labs · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · June 25, 2025 · No. 21-cv-2137-MMA-DDL

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California grants Kimera Labs Inc.'s two motions to seal portions of reply briefs supporting Daubert motions. The court finds that the filings contain confidential production-process information, purported trade secrets, and financial information, and directs the Clerk to file the identified documents under seal.

Holdings

  1. For filings more than tangentially relevant to the merits of a case, a request to seal must satisfy the compelling-reasons standard; filings not meeting that threshold are subject to the good-cause standard.
  2. Confidential production-process information asserted to constitute trade secrets, together with information concerning profits and sales, constitutes the type of confidential business information that may justify sealing when the public docket contains appropriately redacted versions.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should apply the compelling-reasons standard to requests to seal portions of reply briefs concerning pending Daubert motions.
  2. Whether the identified confidential production-process, profits, and sales information justified sealing the requested portions of the briefs.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (8)

  • Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597-98 & n.7 (1978)(followed)
  • Oliner v. Kontrabecki, 745 F.3d 1024, 1025 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • United States v. Bus. of Custer Battlefield Museum & Store, 658 F.3d 1188, 1194-95 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097-1102 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Nia v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 21-CV-1799-BAS-BGS, 2024 WL 171659, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2024)(followed)
  • Pulse Elecs., Inc. v. U.D. Elec. Corp., 530 F. Supp. 3d 988, 1030-31 (S.D. Cal. 2021)(followed)
  • Pulse Elecs., Inc. v. U.D. Elec. Corp., No. 2021-1856, 2022 WL 1436146 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2022)(subsequent history)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…