Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California denied Sky Harbour, LLC’s motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3). The court held that a forum-selection clause does not establish improper venue under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 and that, under Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. U.S. District Court, Rule 12(b)(3) is not the proper procedure for enforcing such a clause when venue is otherwise proper. The court declined to decide whether the clause was enforceable because venue was proper and the issue was not adequately briefed.
Holdings
- Rule 12(b)(3) cannot be used to dismiss an action based solely on a forum-selection clause when the action falls within one of the venue categories in 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).
- Venue was proper in the Southern District of California under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred there.
Questions Presented
- Whether a defendant may use Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) to dismiss an action based on a forum-selection clause when venue is otherwise proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).
- Whether venue was proper in the Southern District of California because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred there.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Piedmont Label Co. v. Sun Garden Packing Co., 598 F.2d 491, 496 (9th Cir.)(followed)
- Argueta v. Banco Mexicano, S.A., 87 F.3d 320, 324 (9th Cir.)(no longer good law on point)
- Atlantic Marine Construction Co., Inc. v. U.S. District Court, 571 U.S. 49 (2013)(followed)
- Express Companies Inc. v. Mitel Tech., Inc., 2013 WL 5462301 (S.D. Cal. 2013)(no longer good law on point)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.