M.M., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, Minhaj Muneer v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., et al.

Muneer · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · December 22, 2025 · No. 24cv529-W (MSB)

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California recommends granting the parties’ joint motion to approve a minor’s compromise in a personal injury action arising from an incident at SeaWorld. The proposed settlement provides a gross recovery of $15,000, with $5,000 allocated to a medical lien and $10,000 as the minor plaintiff’s net recovery; counsel waived attorney’s fees and costs. The court finds the settlement fair, reasonable, and in the minor’s best interests, and approves disbursement by a check payable to the minor’s guardian ad litem.

Holdings

  1. The proposed settlement was fair, reasonable, and in Minor Plaintiff's best interests and should be approved.
  2. No separate reasonableness determination regarding attorney's fees and costs was required because Minor Plaintiff's counsel waived all fees and costs.
  3. The settlement funds could be disbursed by a single $15,000 check payable to Minhaj Muneer as guardian ad litem for Minor Plaintiff.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the proposed $15,000 settlement of the minor's California negligence and premises-liability claims was fair, reasonable, and in the minor's best interests.
  2. Whether the proposed payment and disbursement of the settlement funds complied with the California Probate Code.
  3. Whether attorney's fees and costs required separate reasonableness review when minor Plaintiff's counsel waived them.

Disposition

remanded

Cases Cited (17)

  • Robidoux v. Rosengren, 638 F.3d 1177, 1179, 1181-82 (9th Cir. 2011)(distinguished)
  • Dacanay v. Mendoza, 573 F.2d 1075, 1078, 1080 (9th Cir. 1978)(followed)
  • Salmeron v. United States, 724 F.2d 1357, 1363 (9th Cir. 1984)(followed)
  • DeRuyver v. Omni La Costa Resort & Spa, LLC, No. 17-cv-0516-H-AGS, 2020 WL 563551, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 4, 2020)(followed)
  • J.T. v. Tehachapi Unified Sch. Dist., No. 16-cv-01492-DAD-JLT, 2019 WL 954783, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2019)(followed)
  • A.M.L. v. Cernaianu, LA CV12-06082 JAK (RZx), 2014 WL 12588992, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2014)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Latimer, 166 Cal. App. 3d 667, 676 (1985)(followed)
  • Pearson v. Superior Ct., 202 Cal. App. 4th 1333, 1340 (2012)(followed)
  • Goldberg v. Superior Ct., 23 Cal. App. 4th 1378(followed)
  • T.P. v. United States, No. 10-cv-0295-AJB-RBB, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110897, at *2-3, *6 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2011)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 17.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…