Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California sua sponte stayed the action pending resolution of the plaintiff’s Ninth Circuit appeal. The court vacated the hearing on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint, barred further motions, and ordered the parties to file a joint status report within 48 hours after the appellate decision. The order was entered on November 28, 2025.
Holdings
- A district court may sua sponte stay proceedings under its inherent authority to control the disposition of matters on its docket, and a temporary stay pending resolution of an appeal is appropriate when the balance of potential harm, hardship, and judicial efficiency favors a stay.
- The action should be stayed until resolution of Plaintiff's Ninth Circuit appeal, with the stay automatically lifting upon resolution of the appeal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should sua sponte stay the action pending resolution of Plaintiff's appeal to the Ninth Circuit.
- Whether the hearing on Defendant's motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint should be vacated while the stay is in effect.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (8)
- Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936)(followed)
- Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., 398 F.3d 1098, 1110 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Dependable Highway Express, Inc. v. Navigators Ins. Co., 498 F.3d 1059, 1066 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Owino v. CoreCivic, Inc., No. 17-CV-1112 JLS (NLS), 2018 WL 11282678, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2018)(followed)
- Fussell v. Washington, No. 2:25-CV-01865-RAJ, 2025 WL 3241690, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 20, 2025)(followed)
- Hart v. Weyrich, No. 2:23-CV-884, 2023 WL 5015616, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 7, 2023)(followed)
- Elec. Solidus, Inc. v. Proton Mgmt. Ltd., No. 2:24-CV-08280 MWC-EX, 2025 WL 1712363, at *4 (C.D. Cal. May 27, 2025)(followed)
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…