Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California grants Plaintiffs’ ex parte motion to file under seal their reply supporting a motion to compel further discovery responses. Applying the good-cause standard to a non-dispositive discovery dispute and relying on the parties’ protective order, the Court orders the unredacted reply filed under seal while allowing the redacted version to remain publicly filed.
Holdings
- Because the reply concerned a non-dispositive discovery dispute, was filed pursuant to a valid protective order, and relied on materials designated confidential, the public-access presumption was rebutted and good cause supported sealing the unredacted reply.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiffs showed sufficient good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to seal their unredacted reply and the confidential materials referenced in it.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Orthopaedic Hospital v. Encore Medical, L.P., 2021 WL 5449041, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 19, 2021)(followed)
- Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1213 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…