Rogelio Torres Velasquez v. Kristi Noem, et al.

Case No. 25-cv-3046-AGS-DEB · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · November 13, 2025 · No. 25-cv-3046-AGS-DEB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California determines that Rogelio Torres Velasquez’s habeas challenge to his immigration detention has sufficient potential merit to warrant a response. The court orders respondents to answer by November 26, 2025, sets a petitioner reply deadline of December 10, 2025, schedules oral argument for December 17, 2025, and strikes its prior November 12, 2025 order.

Holdings

  1. The petition presented sufficient potential merit to warrant a response and was not subject to summary dismissal at this stage.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the § 2241 petition presented a sufficiently cognizable and potentially meritorious challenge to immigration detention to warrant a response rather than summary dismissal.
  2. Whether the court should summarily dismiss the petition at the initial screening stage under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Neiss v. Bludworth, 114 F.4th 1038, 1045 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Matter of Yajure Hurtado(described)
  • Mosqueda v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-02304 CAS (BFM), 2025 WL 2591530, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2025)(relied_on)
  • Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025)(relied_on)
  • Rodriguez v. Bostock, No. 3:25-cv-05240-TMC, 2025 WL 2782499, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 30, 2025)(relied_on)
  • Quispe v. Crawford, No. 1:25-cv-1471-AJT-LRV, 2025 WL 2783799, at *6 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2025)(relied_on)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…