Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California determines that Rogelio Torres Velasquez’s habeas challenge to his immigration detention has sufficient potential merit to warrant a response. The court orders respondents to answer by November 26, 2025, sets a petitioner reply deadline of December 10, 2025, schedules oral argument for December 17, 2025, and strikes its prior November 12, 2025 order.
Holdings
- The petition presented sufficient potential merit to warrant a response and was not subject to summary dismissal at this stage.
Questions Presented
- Whether the § 2241 petition presented a sufficiently cognizable and potentially meritorious challenge to immigration detention to warrant a response rather than summary dismissal.
- Whether the court should summarily dismiss the petition at the initial screening stage under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Neiss v. Bludworth, 114 F.4th 1038, 1045 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Matter of Yajure Hurtado(described)
- Mosqueda v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-02304 CAS (BFM), 2025 WL 2591530, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2025)(relied_on)
- Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025)(relied_on)
- Rodriguez v. Bostock, No. 3:25-cv-05240-TMC, 2025 WL 2782499, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 30, 2025)(relied_on)
- Quispe v. Crawford, No. 1:25-cv-1471-AJT-LRV, 2025 WL 2783799, at *6 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2025)(relied_on)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…