Rosaura Pablo Miguel v. Christopher LaRose, et al.

Case No. 25-cv-2644-AGS-MSB · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · October 7, 2025 · No. 25-cv-2644-AGS-MSB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California orders the respondent to respond to Rosaura Pablo Miguel’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging mandatory immigration detention and denial of a bond hearing. The court finds that the petition has sufficient potential merit, particularly concerning whether 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) or § 1225(b)(2)(A) governs the petitioner’s detention.

Holdings

  1. The petition's challenge to the statutory basis for petitioner's mandatory immigration detention had sufficient potential merit to warrant a response and was not subject to summary dismissal at that stage.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the § 2241 petition presented a sufficiently cognizable and potentially meritorious challenge to immigration detention to require a response rather than summary dismissal.
  2. Whether the court should summarily dismiss the petition at the initial screening stage under Rule 4.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Neiss v. Bludworth, 114 F.4th 1038, 1045 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Mosqueda v. Noem, No. 5:25-CV-02304 CAS (BFM), 2025 WL 2591530, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2025)(persuasive authority)
  • Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 2:25-CV-01542-RFB-EJY, 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025)(persuasive authority)
  • Rodriguez v. Bostock, No. 3:25-CV-05240-TMC, 2025 WL 2782499, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 30, 2025)(persuasive authority)
  • Luna Quispe v. Crawford, No. 1:25-CV-1471-AJT-LRV, 2025 WL 2783799, at *6 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2025)(persuasive authority)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…