Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California orders the respondent to respond to Rosaura Pablo Miguel’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging mandatory immigration detention and denial of a bond hearing. The court finds that the petition has sufficient potential merit, particularly concerning whether 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) or § 1225(b)(2)(A) governs the petitioner’s detention.
Holdings
- The petition's challenge to the statutory basis for petitioner's mandatory immigration detention had sufficient potential merit to warrant a response and was not subject to summary dismissal at that stage.
Questions Presented
- Whether the § 2241 petition presented a sufficiently cognizable and potentially meritorious challenge to immigration detention to require a response rather than summary dismissal.
- Whether the court should summarily dismiss the petition at the initial screening stage under Rule 4.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Neiss v. Bludworth, 114 F.4th 1038, 1045 (9th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Mosqueda v. Noem, No. 5:25-CV-02304 CAS (BFM), 2025 WL 2591530, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 8, 2025)(persuasive authority)
- Vazquez v. Feeley, No. 2:25-CV-01542-RFB-EJY, 2025 WL 2676082, at *11 (D. Nev. Sept. 17, 2025)(persuasive authority)
- Rodriguez v. Bostock, No. 3:25-CV-05240-TMC, 2025 WL 2782499, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 30, 2025)(persuasive authority)
- Luna Quispe v. Crawford, No. 1:25-CV-1471-AJT-LRV, 2025 WL 2783799, at *6 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2025)(persuasive authority)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…