Summary
The court granted in part counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following reversal of the Commissioner of Social Security’s decision and remand for calculation and award of benefits. It awarded counsel $30,401.75, representing 25% of the claimant’s $121,607.00 in past-due benefits. The court ordered counsel to reimburse the claimant $8,946.28 in previously awarded EAJA fees.
Holdings
- The requested fee of $30,401.75 was reasonable and did not exceed the twenty-five-percent statutory ceiling because it represented twenty-five percent of Plaintiff's $121,607.00 in past-due benefits.
- Counsel was required to reimburse Plaintiff $8,946.28, the cumulative amount of EAJA fees previously awarded for the federal-court representations.
Questions Presented
- Whether the requested attorney's fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) was reasonable and within the statutory limitation.
- Whether the § 406(b) award had to be offset by EAJA fees previously awarded for the federal-court representation.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (13)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002)(followed)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Parrish v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin., 698 F.3d 1215, 1216-18 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Stone v. Berryhill, 2018 WL 2317549, at *1, *6 (S.D. Cal. May 17, 2018)(cited)
- Stone v. Berryhill, 2018 WL 3327873, at *1-2 (S.D. Cal. July 6, 2018)(cited)
- Culbertson v. Berryhill, 586 U.S. 53, 54 (2019)(followed)
- Ricardo A. v. Saul, 2021 WL 718605, at *2 n.3 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2021)(cited)
- Joel L. v. Bisignano, 2025 WL 2231247, at *1-2 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2025)(cited)
- Patrick S. v. Dudek, 2025 WL 642012, at *1-2 (S.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2025)(cited)
- Richardson v. Colvin, 2017 WL 1683062, at *1-2 (S.D. Cal. May 2, 2017)(cited)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…