Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California adopts a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation in a Social Security appeal. Because neither party objected and the court found no clear error, it remands the action to the Commissioner for further proceedings under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Holdings
- When neither party objects to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, the district court need only determine that there is no clear error on the face of the record before accepting the recommendation.
- The court adopted the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
Questions Presented
- What standard of review applies when neither party objects to a magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation?
- Whether the court should adopt the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation and remand the Social Security action for further administrative proceedings.
Disposition
reversed_and_remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- United States v. Remsing, 874 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir. 1989)(followed)
- United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…