Summary
The court granted Alexi Ayala Perez’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. It held that Immigration and Customs Enforcement violated 8 C.F.R. § 212.5(e)(5) and due process by re-detaining Perez without written notice revoking his parole, an individualized determination, or an opportunity to be heard. The court ordered his immediate release under the same conditions that existed before his May 23, 2025 re-detention.
Holdings
- ICE violated 8 C.F.R. § 212.5(e)(5) by detaining Petitioner without at least written notice revoking his parole.
- Petitioner's sudden re-detention violated the Due Process Clause because he had a protected liberty interest in remaining free from detention and was taken back into custody without notice, an individualized determination, or an opportunity to be heard.
Questions Presented
- Whether ICE violated 8 C.F.R. § 212.5(e)(5) by detaining Petitioner without written notice terminating or revoking his parole.
- Whether Petitioner's sudden re-detention without notice, an individualized determination, or an opportunity to be heard violated the Due Process Clause.
- Whether Petitioner was entitled to habeas relief and immediate release rather than merely a bond hearing.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (6)
- Martinez v. Noem, No. 25-CV-2740-BJC-BJW, 2025 WL 3171738, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2025)(followed)
- Maldonado Bautista v. Noem, No. 5:25-cv-1873-SSS-BFM, 2025 WL 3678485 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2025)(mentioned)
- Valencia Zapata v. Kaiser, No. 25-CV-07492-RFL, 2025 WL 2578207, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2025)(followed)
- Pinchi v. Noem, 792 F. Supp. 3d 1025 (N.D. Cal. 2025)(followed)
- Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976)(followed)
- Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 482 (1972)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…