Jose Arteaga v. M. Palmer and R. Buckel

Arteaga · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · January 6, 2026 · No. 25-cv-03498-AJB-AHG

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California denied Jose Arteaga’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis because he failed to provide a certified trust account statement for the preceding six months. The court dismissed the civil rights action without prejudice and allowed 45 days to either pay the $405 filing and administrative fee or submit a properly supported renewed IFP motion.

Holdings

  1. A prisoner seeking to proceed in forma pauperis must submit the required financial information, including a certified trust-account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint; because Plaintiff did not submit that statement, the court denied the IFP motion.
  2. When a prisoner's IFP application is denied, the action may not proceed unless the required filing fees are paid; because Plaintiff neither paid the fees nor submitted a complete IFP application, the action was dismissed without prejudice.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should grant a prisoner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis when the motion lacks the certified six-month trust-account statement required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).
  2. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice when the plaintiff neither pays the filing fee nor submits a complete IFP application.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (5)

  • Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Hymas v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, 73 F.4th 763, 765, 767 (9th Cir. 2023)(followed)
  • Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016)(followed)
  • Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…