Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California grants Ronald Satish Smith's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The court dismisses his complaint without prejudice for lack of Article III standing, granting leave to amend by February 27, 2026.
Holdings
- Smith could proceed in forma pauperis because he had no assets and his disability payments barely exceeded his expenses.
- Smith lacked Article III standing because he did not allege a concrete and particularized injury in fact caused by the defendants.
- The complaint was subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) because Smith lacked standing.
Questions Presented
- Whether Smith qualified to proceed in forma pauperis.
- Whether Smith had Article III standing to pursue his claims.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Blount v. Saul, No. 21-CV-0679-BLM, 2021 WL 1561453, at *1 (S.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2021)(followed)
- Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…