Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California denied Sergio Diaz Hernandez’s motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence for illegal reentry. The court rejected his ineffective-assistance claims concerning prior removal orders and alleged coercion to withdraw his appeal, relying in part on the valid appellate and collateral-attack waiver in his plea agreement. The court also denied a certificate of appealability and terminated his motion for status.
Holdings
- Petitioner failed to establish ineffective assistance because the record, including his plea-agreement admission and the government's evidence, showed that he had previously been removed from the United States.
- Petitioner could not establish prejudice from counsel's alleged coercion in withdrawing the appeal because he had validly waived his appellate and collateral-attack rights in the plea agreement.
- A certificate of appealability was denied because reasonable jurists would not find the court's assessment of the claims debatable or wrong.
Questions Presented
- Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to move to dismiss on the ground that Petitioner had not previously been ordered removed from the United States.
- Whether counsel's alleged coercion of Petitioner into withdrawing his appeal constituted ineffective assistance causing prejudice.
- Whether Petitioner was entitled to a certificate of appealability.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)(followed)
- U.S. v. Quintero-Barraza, 78 F.3d 1344 (9th Cir. 1995)(followed)
- Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…