William Rittel v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

Rittel · United States District Court for the Southern District of California · January 28, 2026 · No. 23-cv-01075-BAS-MSB

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of California grants William Rittel’s motion for approval of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court approves $6,426.50, representing 25% of past-due Social Security benefits, and finds no basis for a downward adjustment. The court also orders counsel to remit a prior $1,500 EAJA fee award to Rittel because it compensated the same work.

Holdings

  1. A contingent-fee agreement providing counsel with 25 percent of the claimant's past-due benefits may be approved when the agreement and resulting fee are reasonable and there is no fraud, overreaching, substandard performance, excessive delay, or windfall. The court approved the requested $6,426.50 fee.
  2. When § 406(b) and EAJA fees compensate the same work, counsel must offset the § 406(b) fee by remitting the EAJA award to the claimant.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the contingent-fee agreement providing counsel with 25 percent of past-due Social Security benefits produced a reasonable fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b).
  2. Whether counsel must remit the prior EAJA fee award to the claimant when the EAJA and § 406(b) awards compensate the same work.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Culbertson v. Berryhill, 586 U.S. 53, 57 (2019)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796-809 (2002)(followed)
  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1147, 1151-52 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
  • Parrish v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 698 F.3d 1215, 1218 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…