Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida grants Apple Corps Limited and Subafilms Limited’s motion for a preliminary injunction in a trademark-counterfeiting action involving the BEATLES and YELLOW SUBMARINE marks. The order enjoins the defendants from using the plaintiffs’ marks, requires preservation of evidence, and directs financial institutions and online marketplaces to restrain and identify associated funds. The injunction remains effective during the pendency of the action or until further order, subject to a $10,000 bond.
Holdings
- Plaintiffs satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction because the evidence showed a strong probability of success on the merits, likely consumer confusion, likely irreparable injury, a balance of harms favoring plaintiffs, and a public interest in preventing the sale of counterfeit goods.
- The court could impose an asset restraint and related measures to preserve funds, inventory, evidence, and other assets associated with defendants' alleged counterfeiting activities and to ensure the availability of potential equitable relief.
- Plaintiffs were required to maintain their previously posted $10,000 bond as security for damages defendants might sustain from a wrongful injunction or restraint.
Questions Presented
- Whether plaintiffs demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on their Lanham Act trademark counterfeiting and infringement claims sufficient to warrant a preliminary injunction.
- Whether plaintiffs demonstrated irreparable injury, a favorable balance of harms, and that an injunction would serve the public interest.
- Whether the court could impose an asset restraint and related preservation, disclosure, and payment-account measures as equitable preliminary relief.
- What security plaintiffs were required to provide under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) and 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d)(5)(D).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Schiavo ex. rel. Schindler v. Schiavo, 403 F.3d 1223, 1225-26 (11th Cir. 2005)(followed)
- Reebok Int'l, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enters., Inc., 970 F.2d 552, 559 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
- Fuller Brush Prods. Co. v. Fuller Brush Co., 299 F.2d 772, 777 (7th Cir. 1962)(followed)
- Levi Strauss & Co., 51 F.3d 982, 987(followed)
- Federal Trade Commission v. United States Oil & Gas Corp., 748 F.2d 1431, 1433-34 (11th Cir. 1984)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…