Bridlington Bud Ltd. v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A

Bridlington Bud · United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida · March 13, 2026 · No. 25-cv-25717-GAYLES

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida grants Bridlington Bud Ltd.’s motion for a preliminary injunction against unidentified partnerships and unincorporated associations alleged to be selling counterfeit products bearing the AUQ trademark. The order prohibits further infringement, restrains the transfer or disposal of defendants’ assets, directs certain third-party providers to freeze connected accounts and funds, and requires a $10,000 bond.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff was entitled to a preliminary injunction because the evidence established a strong probability of proving consumer confusion and trademark infringement, likely immediate and irreparable injury, a balance of harms favoring plaintiff, and that an injunction served the public interest.
  2. Defendants and persons acting in concert with them were preliminarily enjoined from using the AUQ mark or counterfeit or colorable imitations, passing off goods as genuine AUQ products, causing consumer confusion, infringing plaintiff's mark, competing unfairly, and dealing in unauthorized goods bearing the mark.
  3. The court could preliminarily restrain defendants from transferring or disposing of their assets and could require identified third-party providers to locate and restrain accounts and funds connected to defendants.
  4. The $10,000 bond posted by plaintiff was sufficient and would remain with the court.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff demonstrated the requirements for a preliminary injunction against alleged online sellers of counterfeit goods.
  2. Whether the court could preliminarily enjoin defendants from using the AUQ mark and related acts of passing off and unfair competition.
  3. Whether the court could impose an asset freeze and require third-party payment and marketplace providers to restrain defendants' accounts and funds.
  4. Whether plaintiff's $10,000 bond was sufficient under the preliminary injunction.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Schiavo ex rel. Schindler v. Schiavo, 403 F.3d 1223, 1225-26 (11th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc., 970 F.2d 552, 559 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Fuller Brush Products Co. v. Fuller Brush Co., 299 F.2d 772, 777 (7th Cir. 1962)(followed)
  • Levi Strauss & Co. v. Sunrise International Trading Inc., 51 F.3d 982, 987 (11th Cir. 1995)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…