Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida affirmed and adopted a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. The court dismissed the plaintiff’s supplemental and amended civil rights complaint as untimely and procedurally deficient, denied her request for a preliminary injunction, overruled her objections, and closed the case.
Holdings
- Objections that do not specifically identify the challenged portions of the Report and Recommendation, the basis for the objections, and supporting legal authority are improper and may be overruled without direct consideration.
- An amended complaint filed after the court-ordered deadline may be dismissed when the prior order warned that failure to file timely would result in dismissal, particularly where the amended pleading also fails to cure previously identified procedural and pleading defects.
- Plaintiff was not entitled to a preliminary injunction because the emergency request failed to satisfy the requirements for issuance of such relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation were sufficiently specific to require direct consideration.
- Whether the supplemental and amended civil-rights complaint should be dismissed as untimely and procedurally deficient.
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to a preliminary injunction halting the identified Florida state-court proceedings.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (1)
- Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 F. App'x 781, 783 (11th Cir. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…