Marlen Mesa Martinez v. Kristi Noem, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al.

Mesa Martinez v. Noem · United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida · February 19, 2026 · No. 1:25-cv-23758-RAR

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss an action seeking mandamus, Administrative Procedure Act review, and declaratory relief concerning USCIS’s adjudication of the plaintiff’s Form I-485 application. The court held that the case was moot because the application had been adjudicated and alternatively concluded that the court lacked jurisdiction to review USCIS’s discretionary denial of adjustment of status under the Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act.

Holdings

  1. USCIS's adjudication of Plaintiff's application eliminated the relief sought in the initial complaint and rendered the case moot because no live controversy remained for which the court could provide meaningful relief.
  2. Mandamus relief was unavailable because Plaintiff did not establish a clear and indisputable right to the requested relief or a clear, nondiscretionary duty requiring Defendants to grant adjustment of status or reach a particular conclusion.
  3. The APA did not provide jurisdiction to review USCIS's discretionary denial of Plaintiff's adjustment-of-status application because the adjustment decision was committed to agency discretion by law.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether USCIS's adjudication of Plaintiff's Form I-485 application mooted her action seeking an order compelling adjudication.
  2. Whether the court could grant mandamus relief to compel USCIS to find Plaintiff eligible for adjustment of status or to apply governing precedent in a particular manner.
  3. Whether the APA permits judicial review of USCIS's discretionary denial of adjustment of status under the Cuban Refugee Adjustment Act.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (18)

  • Lawrence v. Dunbar, 919 F.2d 1525, 1528-29 (11th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Mafundu v. Mayorkas, 699 F. Supp. 3d 1310, 1310-13 (S.D. Fla. 2023)(followed)
  • Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 572 F.3d 1271, 1279 (11th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994)(followed)
  • Soliman v. United States ex rel. INS, 296 F.3d 1237, 1242 (11th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Al Najjar v. Ashcroft, 273 F.3d 1330, 1336 (11th Cir. 2001)(followed)
  • Fla. Ass'n of Rehab. Facilities, Inc. v. Fla. Dep't of Health and Rehab. Servs., 225 F.3d 1208, 1216-17 (11th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Gray v. Sec'y for Dep't of Homeland Sec., 452 F. App'x 873, 875 (11th Cir. 2011) (per curiam)(followed)
  • Bathazi v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 667 F. Supp. 2d 1375, 1378 (S.D. Fla. 2009)(followed)
  • Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC) Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 189 (2000)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 18.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…