Silvio Hidalgo v. Lee Dudek, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Hidalgo · United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida · January 29, 2026 · No. 24-cv-24746-BLOOM/D’Angelo

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation in a Social Security disability action. The court denied Plaintiff Silvio Hidalgo’s motion for summary judgment, granted the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and affirmed the administrative decision finding that Hidalgo was not disabled. The court also denied pending motions as moot and directed the Clerk to close the case.

Holdings

  1. The Commissioner's decision denying benefits was adequately supported by substantial evidence and did not contain reversible legal error.
  2. The ALJ did not commit reversible error by failing to call a medical expert because the administrative record already contained sufficient evidence to support the residual functional capacity determination.
  3. The reviewing court could not decide the facts anew, reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Commissioner; because the ALJ's decision was supported by substantial evidence, the court was required to affirm.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the Commissioner's determination that Plaintiff was not disabled was supported by substantial evidence and free of legal error.
  2. Whether the ALJ erred by determining Plaintiff's residual functional capacity without calling a medical expert.
  3. Whether Plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment and whether the Commissioner was entitled to summary judgment.

Disposition

affirmed

Cases Cited (2)

  • Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Mitchell v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 771 F.3d 780, 782 (11th Cir. 2014)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…