Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida adopted a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation in a Social Security disability action. The court denied Plaintiff Silvio Hidalgo’s motion for summary judgment, granted the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and affirmed the administrative decision finding that Hidalgo was not disabled. The court also denied pending motions as moot and directed the Clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- The Commissioner's decision denying benefits was adequately supported by substantial evidence and did not contain reversible legal error.
- The ALJ did not commit reversible error by failing to call a medical expert because the administrative record already contained sufficient evidence to support the residual functional capacity determination.
- The reviewing court could not decide the facts anew, reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Commissioner; because the ALJ's decision was supported by substantial evidence, the court was required to affirm.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Commissioner's determination that Plaintiff was not disabled was supported by substantial evidence and free of legal error.
- Whether the ALJ erred by determining Plaintiff's residual functional capacity without calling a medical expert.
- Whether Plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment and whether the Commissioner was entitled to summary judgment.
Disposition
affirmed
Cases Cited (2)
- Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Mitchell v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 771 F.3d 780, 782 (11th Cir. 2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…