William Ramirez v. TD Dans Corp. and Sergio Dans

Ramirez · United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida · May 14, 2026 · No. 23-cv-20820-BLOOM/Elfenbein

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida denied William Ramirez’s motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) to vacate the dismissal without prejudice and reinstate the case. The court concluded that Ramirez failed to establish excusable neglect and that reinstatement would prejudice the defendants after repeated failures to comply with court orders and attend scheduled proceedings.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff failed to establish excusable neglect sufficient to vacate the dismissal without prejudice because he did not provide a good reason for failing to comply with the Court's orders or appear at the mediation and show-cause hearing.
  2. Reinstating the case would prejudice Defendants because they had incurred unnecessary attorney's fees and costs and experienced prolonged uncertainty, disruption, and inability to obtain closure.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff established excusable neglect warranting relief from the prior dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1).
  2. Whether reinstating the action would prejudice Defendants.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Safari Programs, Inc. v. CollectA International Ltd., 686 F. App'x 737, 743-44 (11th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • In re Worldwide Web Systems, Inc., 328 F.3d 1291, 1295 (11th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd., 507 U.S. 380, 395 (1993)(followed)
  • Sream, Inc. v. Ecstasy Fashion II, Inc., No. 18-cv-61216, 2018 WL 10374693, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2018)(cited)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…