Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia directs service of Mohammadullah Assadi’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging his detention by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The Order requires the Warden-Respondent to answer within seven business days, permits a petitioner reply within three days, and provides for an informal telephonic conference. It also establishes procedures for requesting interim relief, including release from detention, removal restrictions, or transfer restrictions.
Holdings
- Because it did not plainly appear that Petitioner was not entitled to relief, the court declined to dismiss the petition at the screening stage and ordered service and an answer.
- A petitioner seeking release from detention while a habeas petition is pending must show a likelihood of success on the merits of a substantial constitutional claim and extraordinary and exceptional circumstances making release necessary to preserve the effectiveness of the requested habeas relief.
Questions Presented
- Whether the petition should be dismissed at preliminary screening because it plainly appeared that Assadi was not entitled to habeas relief.
- What service, answer, record-production, and reply procedures should govern the initial processing of the § 2241 petition.
- What showing would be required for interim release from detention while the habeas petition remains pending.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (4)
- Wilcox v. Ford, 813 F.2d 1140 (11th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Gomez v. United States, 899 F.2d 1124 (11th Cir. 1990)(followed)
- Wilson v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., No. 17-10060-D, 2017 WL 11815408, at *1 (11th Cir. May 10, 2017)(followed)
- Mapp v. Reno, 241 F.3d 221, 225 (2d Cir. 2001)(persuasive)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…