Charles Carpenter v. United States Postal Service, Lisa Pittman, and Joseph Junti

Carpenter · United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois · March 13, 2026 · No. 26-cv-00217-JPG

Summary

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois considers Charles Carpenter’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in an employment-related action against the United States Postal Service and two individuals. The court finds that the allegations do not state a claim under a federal employment discrimination statute and that diversity jurisdiction cannot be determined because the defendants’ citizenship is not alleged. The court orders Carpenter to show cause by April 13, 2026, reserves ruling on the in forma pauperis motion, and permits him to file an amended complaint.

Holdings

  1. Allegations that a defendant misrepresented whether an injury occurred on the job and that another defendant attempted to obstruct OWCD benefits were insufficient to state a claim under a federal employment discrimination statute.
  2. The court could not determine whether diversity jurisdiction existed because Plaintiff had not alleged the citizenship of all defendants.
  3. Although Plaintiff established indigency, the court reserved ruling on his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and required him to show cause why the action should not be dismissed or to file an amended complaint curing the deficiencies.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff's allegations stated a federal employment discrimination claim sufficient to invoke federal-question jurisdiction.
  2. Whether diversity jurisdiction could be determined when Plaintiff had not alleged the citizenship of all defendants.
  3. Whether Plaintiff should be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis before curing the jurisdictional and pleading deficiencies.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989)(followed)
  • Corgain v. Miller, 708 F.2d 1241, 1247 (7th Cir. 1983)(followed)
  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 547 (2007)(followed)
  • Lucien v. Roegner, 682 F.2d 625, 626 (7th Cir. 1982)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…