Summary
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois conducted preliminary screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A of Corey Williams’s prisoner civil rights complaint arising from an alleged use of excessive force at Lawrence Correctional Center. The court allowed Eighth Amendment excessive-force and Illinois assault-and-battery claims to proceed against John Doe Officers 1–7, and a deliberate-indifference-to-medical-needs claim to proceed against John Doe Officers 2–6 and 8. Claims against Jeremiah Brown, Sergeant Belcher, Counselor Fitzgerald, John Does 9–11, and unspecified officers were dismissed without prejudice; Brown was added in his official capacity solely to facilitate discovery identifying the John Doe defendants.
Holdings
- The complaint plausibly stated an Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim against John Doe officers 1 through 7, so Count 1 could proceed.
- The complaint plausibly stated Illinois assault and battery claims against John Doe officers 1 through 7, and those claims could proceed as Count 2.
- The complaint plausibly stated an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim against John Doe officers 2 through 6 and 8 for failing to obtain medical care, so Count 3 could proceed.
- Claims against additional unidentified officers, John Does 9 through 11, Counselor Fitzgerald, and Sergeant Belcher were dismissed without prejudice because the complaint did not sufficiently connect those defendants to a constitutional violation.
Questions Presented
- Whether the complaint plausibly stated an Eighth Amendment excessive-force claim against John Doe officers 1 through 7.
- Whether the complaint plausibly stated Illinois assault and battery claims arising from the same alleged use of force.
- Whether the complaint plausibly stated an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference-to-medical-needs claim against John Doe officers 2 through 6 and 8.
- Whether the claims against unidentified officers, John Does 9 through 11, Counselor Fitzgerald, and Sergeant Belcher were sufficiently pleaded to proceed.
- Whether the current warden could be added in his official capacity solely to facilitate discovery identifying the John Doe defendants.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Wilborn v. Ealey, 881 F.3d 998, 1006 (7th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 6 (1992)(followed)
- Shea v. Winnebago County Sheriff's Department, No. 17-3078, 746 F. App'x 541, 548 (7th Cir. Aug. 16, 2018)(followed)
- Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation, 512 F.3d 921, 936 (7th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.